AB Fishing Tackle

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Fishing Tackle
  • Fishing Rods
  • Fishing Gear
  • Fishing Equipment
  • Fishing Store

AB Fishing Tackle

Header Banner

AB Fishing Tackle

  • Home
  • Fishing Tackle
  • Fishing Rods
  • Fishing Gear
  • Fishing Equipment
  • Fishing Store
Fishing Gear
Home›Fishing Gear›Monster Energy sues fishing gear company over customer confusion

Monster Energy sues fishing gear company over customer confusion

By Sharon D. Horowitz
April 6, 2022
0
0

from monster-mash department

Normally when discussing a company that has appeared on our pages before for being a brand bully, I like to list and link to a few examples. Monster Energy, the company that makes fizzy caffeine bombs in liquid form, makes this all very silly. Just look at all the stories we’ve done about the company to see why: there are simply too many to choose from. I could be convinced that the company was, in fact, doing some kind of cutting-edge piece of art highlighting the horrors of the brand bully if I weren’t so knowledgeable about the overall ridiculous Monster behavior.

And here we are again. Monster Energy sued Slimecat Rods, a fishing gear company, for trademark infringement, among other things. Why? Well, some equipment qualifies as “monster” equipment.

The defendants are allegedly involved in the manufacture, design and marketing of fishing gear. Plaintiff alleges that their products use trademarks and trade dress similar to those of Monster in a manner that may confuse consumers. The stylization and color scheme of the defendant’s logo allegedly creates a “strikingly similar commercial impression” to that of Monster.

Since defendants allegedly market their products to a similar audience to plaintiffs, Monster says they are likely to cause “confusion, error and deception among the relevant consumer public.” Monster believes that if the misconduct continues, they will suffer damage and irreparable harm to their reputation.

There are two things we need to tackle here: the similarity of trade dress and the whole “similar audience” claim. As for the similarity of marks, Monster Energy does what it always does in these combinations and spends several pages listing all of its marks on the word “monster” and embedding a bunch of images showing those marks in commerce . Then, as is again typical, it shows the “counterfeit” marks to show how similar they are. For example:

Confused? Me too! This is nothing like Monster Energy’s overall brand image. Nothing about it would puzzle anyone looking to catch fish. The Slimecat name is prominently displayed on the branding. Everything is very distinct. But Monster’s costume calls this use “mistake-like”. If that doesn’t sound absurd to you, the problem lies with you.

Not content with making such silly claims, Monster goes on to note that both companies use green and black coloring in their branding, before diving ridiculously deep into the similarity. some of the letters are in the police.

Again, if you think these are extremely similar in terms of font difference, you’re the problem, not Slimecat.

But wait, I hear you saying, Monster makes drinks and clothes, not fishing gear. These aren’t in the same market, so branding shouldn’t really apply. Well, Monster’s answer to that is that they sponsor fishing and outdoor events. Yes really.

Since 2019, Monster has also been the official and exclusive energy drink sponsor of the American Bass Anglers, Inc. (ABA) tournament course and has been featured at the ABA Open Series. Each ABA Open Series division offers four one-day qualifying events in a boater/co-fisherman format. Monster was also featured as a sponsor of the Ultimate Bass Team Tour, including its Tournament of Champions on Lake Mohave. Photographic examples of these events are shown below.

But this is not the same as directly using the marks in commerce by supplying a product or service in a certain category. KIA is not suddenly into basketball because it sponsors the NBA. I’ve seen this tactic attempted by other companies in the past and don’t recall it ever working.

And, when you put that alongside the spurious nature of the rest of Monster’s claims, it all comes across as bullying at best, or downright stupid at worst. So, you know, about equal over Monster Energy.

Filed Under: energy drinks, peach, brand, brand bullying

Companies: Monster Energy, Slimecat Rods

Related posts:

  1. Global Fishing Gear Subscription Service Market 2021 Key Players and Production Information Analysis with Forecast 2026 – The Manomet Current
  2. Best Saltwater Fishing Gear for Beginners of 2021: Affordable and High Quality
  3. Best Shimano reels: premium fishing gear
  4. Best Prime Day Hunting and Fishing Deals (2021): Early Fly Fishing Gear, Fish Finder, Hunting Backpack and More Savings Wanted by Retail Egg
Recent Posts
  • Is MSTR Facing Possible Bankruptcy Following Bitcoin’s Collapse?
  • Fishing Equipment Market Size and Forecast
  • Publishers avoid ‘bankruptcy for reporting the truth’ as ​​government scraps Section 40 court fees for press
  • EJF praises Department of Fisheries for gear directive; calls for more reforms in the fisheries sector
  • india sri lanka news: India to step up aid as Sri Lanka nears bankruptcy
Categories
  • Fishing Equipment
  • Fishing Gear
  • Fishing Rods
  • Fishing Store
  • Fishing Tackle
Archives
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • November 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • May 2011
  • March 2011
  • November 2009
  • July 2007
  • October 2006
  • May 2006
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions